U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan, Wis., announced the findings of a new Government Accountability Office report regarding taxpayer funded school voucher programs and how they are failing to provide students with equitable opportunity.

As part of the report Pocan requested, the GAO studied 27 taxpayer funded private school voucher and education savings account programs in the 2016-17 school year.

“The new report from GAO shows the outrageously low standards to which many school voucher programs are held. As Secretary (Betsy) DeVos continues her assault on public education and efforts to privatize schools, it is more important than ever to ensure that these programs are held accountable,” Pocan stated. “Every student deserves the opportunity to go to a school that meets their needs and every parent should have the guarantee that their child is in a safe, equitable, and successful environment. The U.S. Department of Education must address the concerns in this report and should immediately institute the GAO’s recommendations. Our students deserve nothing less.”

“Betsy DeVos has made expanding private school vouchers and voucher-like schemes the centerpiece of her agenda, including pushing for these schemes at the federal level. This GAO report highlights how vouchers hurt, not help, students with disabilities,” added Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers. “The federal government should be working to support students with disabilities, not undermining their federal rights and protections.” 

In other statement following the release of the report, Daniel Domenech, executive director of the American Association of School Administrators, said, “Congress should amend IDEA immediately to ensure that parents of children with disabilities know the important rights and services they are leaving behind when they take a private school voucher. These scathing findings detailing the lack of transparency and accountability in state voucher programs by a nonpartisan government office should concern all taxpayers, but particularly families with children in public school who see their dollars ripped out of the public school system to support these deeply flawed programs.” 

Of the 27 programs studied by the GAO, only 8 of the programs required private schools to comply with annual financial audits, meaning that the states funding the schools often had no clear understanding of the programs the investments are funding.

The GAO also found that many of the programs lack accountability and transparency when it comes to disability protections, education standards, professional standards and information distributed to parents.

Findings from the GAO report include:

  • Only about half of the private schools participating in voucher programs provided special education or disability-related information on their websites, creating a significant problem for families making a decision about where to send their children.
  • Private school voucher programs are inconsistently providing information on changes in key protections and rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) when parents move a child with a disability from a public to a private school.
  • 83 percent of students who were enrolled in a program specifically designed for students with disabilities were enrolled in one that either provided no information or inaccurate information regarding the changes in IDEA rights.
  • One third of the 27 programs operating in school year 2016-17 had no academic testing requirements and officials in two of the programs interviewed indicated that some private schools were unfamiliar or unequipped to administer standardized tests.
  • Only one-third of the programs require schools to publically report test results.
  • Only four programs provided information on the graduation rates at participating schools.
  • Only an estimated 13 percent of all private schools participating in voucher programs provide student and school performance data on their websites.
  • Just 17 of the programs required background checks on all employees or on employees with direct and unsupervised contact with children.



Load comments