Wimbledon Men’s Singles Accumulator: Prediction and Betting Tips

11:00, Jul 03 2021
11:00, Jul 03 2021
Countdown to event
00
00
00
00
Event starts in
00
00
00
00

© Photo by AELTC/JOE TOTH/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Blog sponsor

Betting in
Four–match Wimbledon men’s singles accumulator prediction for Saturday at The All England Club in London. We have chosen four matches for an accumulator bet in the Wimbledon third round on Saturday. Read along for our free prediction and betting tips.
Statistics per month: Winnings: 113$ % of profit: 5.4 bets: 207 Won: 118 Statistic >

Hubert Hurkacz vs Alexander Bublik

Over 39.5 Games 1.83 

  • Both players have won their first two matches in straight sets. It is expected to be a close match with both players winning a big number of games as they have won 85% of the points on their first serve.

 

Ilya Ivashka vs Jordan Thompson

Under 40 Games 1.88 

  • Jordan Thompson had a good win against world number 14 Casper Ruud in the first round in five sets. Ivashka is on great form on grass this season with a 9-4 record. It looks like a recipe for quite a lot of games.

 

Lorenzo Sonego vs James Duckworth

Over 37.5 games 1.83 

  • Lorenzo Sonego is the better-ranked player and won 77% of his first-serve points. Duckworth is in great form on grass with an 8-3 record this year. We predict a close match.

 

Matteo Berrettini vs Aljaz Bedene

Under 35.5 Games 2.05 

  • Matteo Berrettini is on a seven-match winning streak on grass after winning the title in London prior to Wimbledon. Bedene lost two of his first-round matches in Eastbourne and London and will be tough for him against the Italian.

 

Total four-match Wimbledon Accumulator  12.90 

 

 

Accumulator: Pending
11:00/3 jul
Hubert Hurkacz vs Alexander Bublik
11:00/3 jul
Ilya Ivashka vs Jordan Thompson
11:00/3 jul
Lorenzo Sonego vs James Duckworth
11:00/3 jul
Matteo Berrettini vs Aljaz Bedene
Accumulator
to:
Will this bet win?
Voted 0 user
Yes 50%
No 50%
Yes
No
Don't you agree with the expert?
Suggest your tip
Found a mistake?Let us know
Still have questions? Ask our experts!
Comments